Re: FischerTechnik

dan miller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.lego.robotics
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Well I got my FT set (Robo Mobile) -- I have to say I'm a bit disappointed. 
It doesn't seem like I can build anything that isn't more or less a
variation on the core design of the set.  To get enough pieces to do
open-ended MOC's, you would have to spend thousands of dollars.

Plus, when you get down to it, I don't really want to re-learn all the
tricks I learned for Lego.  I'm a bit surprised at how much knowledge I seem
to have internalized around the Lego mindset.  It's not easy to change
horses midstream, as it were.

Anyone want to buy a slightly used FT robot set?

-dbm


--- danny staple <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> On 28/08/05, PeterBalch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > late last night I stumbled onto their website:
> > > http://www.fischertechnik.com/
> > > Does anyone have a set, and/or have any experience building with it? 
> How
> > > does it compare to Mindstorms?
> > 
> > I used to have fischertechnik but sold it and bought lego. My objections
> to
> > fischertechnik were:
> > 
> > It's bigger and heavier for the same mechanical functionality. So you
> need
> > bigger motors, batteries, etc.
> > 
> > The bricks don't click into "integer" positions but can slide around and
> so
> > require more bracing.
> > 
> > The axles are round so it's harder to fix the phase relationships of
> gears.
> > I was interested in building walking machines where fixed phase
> > relationships are essential.
> > 
> > I haven't looked at fischertechnik in 15 years so maybe these problems
> have
> > been solved.
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> There are a couple of areas where FT does outshine Leg a little.
> Namely - Pneumatics - FischerTechnik has a larger range of cylinders,
> more advanced valves, serious compressors, and most importantly
> solenoids.
> 
> Also their robotics controller has a great deal more in terms of IO
> flexibility than the RCX. Although it appears to be somewhat larger.
> 
> I agree that their designs do mean that things slide around a bit -
> and have to be braced harder. I havent used it for a while though -
> but I seem to remember that the gear fixings were based upon grub
> screws. It is possible to build cross-system models with them both,
> and the push fits of Lego pneumatics are compatible with the FT
> pneumatics.
> 
> On the European/UK website some of the kits have handy PDF part
> catalogues - something that it would be handy for Lego to do, although
> we do have Peeron.
> 
> OrionRobots
> -- 
> http://orionrobots.co.uk - Build Robots
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.