Re: PF train motor
"Dave Sterling" <dave@ <"spamsucks>smsrallysport.com"@ipx11873.ipxserver.de> Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:21:48 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.lego.robotics |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In lugnet.trains, Eric Albrecht wrote: > In lugnet.trains, Dave Sterling wrote: >>> Paul >> >> I just noticed the new PF Lithium Polymer Battery Box output is 7.4V. Am I >> missing something here? Did they drop it from 9V since most people only run >> their train controllers at the 4th or 5th 'hash mark' equating to about 7.4V >> maximum? Is this going to pose an issue with longer/heavier trains? >> >> Just thinking... > > > They made it 7.4V because all lithium polymer battery cells are 3.6 - 3.8V. > Since this is a pack with 2 cells in series, you get 7.4V. A 3 cell pack is > typically 11.2V. As you can see, keeping the old 9V system was not really an > option if using Lithium power. LEGO could have used Nickel Metal Hydride > (NiMH), but the batteries would have weighed a lot more and had a lot less > capacity. 1150 mAh is pretty substantial when you consider that a car battery > may only be 20x this. > > Regarding the motors, I would assume that the new motors were designed to have > adequate power at 7.4V. There's no reason they couldn't have the same power at > 7.4V as the old motors did at 9V, they would simply draw more current. > > Eric Albrecht Eric: Thanks for the awesome explanation! I learned new stuff today...does that mean I can go home now? :-) I'm excited to see how the new motor and battery box pull. I think the new PF trains could add a lot of functionality to existing 9V layouts. I'm planning to incorporate PF into my layout for BW for sure. Thanks again for the electrical information. I'm an electrical doofus. ;-) Best Regards, Dave ToT-LUG