Re: another comparison
"Claude Baumann" <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:46:39 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.lego.robotics |
|---|---|
| Organization | Boarding School Convict Episcopal |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In lugnet.robotics, Claude Baumann wrote: > We have compared the sampling and computing speed of NXT and RCX. NXT uses > standard firmware 1.03 and is programmed with the LabVIEW toolkit. RCX is > programmed with ULTIMATE ROBOLAB. Both bricks do the same thing: computing the > DFT on a small dataset of 128 points that are read from the legacy light-sensor > on a shaft encoder that is rotated with a legacy motor. ULTIMATE ROBOLAB keeps > the whole system running (managing sensors, sound, display, buttons, > IR-communication...) e.a. all the things that the standard firmware also is > doing; so there is no reduced funtionality and thus no tricky speed gain. Both > programs are absolutely comparable. But the RCX operates the sampling plus DFT > 22.8 times faster than NXT! This is intriguing. > Beating the RCX is not that simple ! Now the new LabVIEW NXT tookit 2.0 that includes firmware 1.26 drastically beets the RCX performance ( http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4435 ). We repeated the experiment and now the NXT runs the DFT much faster than the RCX with more features: power-spectrum (needs floating point data) with graph on the NXT display; life graphs on the PC. Please consult the new experiment: http://www.convict.lu/htm/rob/RFT_second.htm So, congrates to LEGO and NI for this excellent programming work. ( Btw legoengineering (Tufts CEEO) offers free download of fw 1.28: http://legoengineering.com/library/doc_details/250-nxt-firmware-v128.html ) Claude