Re: Train motors comparison
"Ed McGlynn" <[email protected]> Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:21:35 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.lego.robotics |
|---|---|
| Organization | None |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote: > In lugnet.announce, Philippe Hurbain wrote: >> The 9V, RC and Power Functions train motors compete around a track under >> close scrutiny of an on-board NXT... >> >> Complete test results [<http://www.philohome.com/ttrain/ttrain.htm here>]. > > Okay, this is awesome work, Philippe, to see the comparison of the new PF > motor vs the 9 volt motor. As an eight wider, I always lamented the > underpowered 9 volt motor in its attempts to pull heavy, 8 wide consists. But > it wasn't such an issue because one could always just add more motors. There > certainly were, however, diminished returns in terms of track voltage. We at > the TCLTC used souped up speed controllers, but that still didn't solve the > problem of overheated, over-worked 9 volt motors. > > Though I would never switch to the new track, I would consider retooling with > these superior motors. > > I haven't even checked to see if these are available yet on US SAH. > > In any event, thanks for posting! > > [JOHN] Ditto, except 6 wide. Thanks, Phillipe. Ed