Re: RFC: Moving to github
Thiago A. Corrêa <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.ethernut |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAExDhvbJSz1nzX9iNJBxmHCe2z7QcC-LVxYZU-SdPAxc3K5DRA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Harald Kipp <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no concerns keeping the SVN repository at SF as a central > "official" code base, but would move hot developments to public Git > repositories. To me, it makes no difference, where these repositories > are hosted. > IMHO it would be best that the "official" repository to be git repository then. Hosted anywhere, either SF, GitHub or GitLab. Release files could be kept in SF. I understand the argument that devs break other platforms unknowingly, but still I don't think making "official" fragments would be beneficial, it would be just another place to patch bugs in the arch independent portions (or worst, forget to patch them). _______________________________________________ http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion