Re: RFC: Moving to github
Uwe Bonnes <bon-1JbLm1bU5j5ZIx36JBfelj3+ndqKAYMe9FMPySWZwLkb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.ethernut |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Ole" == Ole Reinhardt <ole.reinhardt-L1vi/[email protected]> writes: ... Ole> I'm daily working a lot with git. We normally use a feature-branch Ole> like workflow in our office and I personally would appreciate this Ole> one for Nut/OS as well, but also the forking workflow could be very Ole> interesting, as long as at least one central repository remains for Ole> the releases. Ole, what keep you from using git-svn for NutOs from sourceforge? (Beside the present SF downtime) nothing hinders anyone from using the workflow one is used to. Nothing hinders anyone from forking NutOs at github. So I don't understand this discussion this discussion at all. Bye -- Uwe Bonnes bon-1JbLm1bU5j5ZIx36JBfelj3+ndqKAYMe9FMPySWZwLkb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ---------- _______________________________________________ http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion