Re: Race condition and stack overflow in tcpsm.c
Philipp Burch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.ethernut |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Uwe! On 08.01.2016 10:20, Uwe Bonnes wrote: >>>>>> "Philipp" == Philipp Burch <[email protected]> writes: > > Philipp> Cool, thanks Ole! This reminds me that I've never touched > Philipp> Ethernut for what seems like an eternity now... > > Any news on the TI header license front? > > For MSP432, the header seem to have a compatible license. At least I don't know about news. The latest posting in http://e2e.ti.com/support/microcontrollers/tiva_arm/f/908/t/293863#pi239031350=3 is mine concerning some change in the licensing, but it never got an answer. It still seems to be necessary to fill in a form and accept the same conditions, of which (d) and (e) probably are the only ones which actually could be a problem for Ethernut, since we can't control who downloads the source: ----------- 8< --------------- 8< -------------- (d) I WILL NOT EXPORT, re-EXPORT or TRANSFER this Software/Tool/Document to any prohibited destination, entity, or individual without the necessary export license(s) or authorization(s) from the U.S. Government. (e) I will NOT USE or TRANSFER this Software/Tool/Document for use in any sensitive NUCLEAR, CHEMICAL or BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, or MISSILE TECHNOLOGY end-uses unless authorized by the U.S. Government by regulation or specific license. ----------- 8< --------------- 8< -------------- It's annoying. At least one of those headers is included in my (public) TIVA branch for quite some time now with no one even asking about it, but it may still not be entirely correct. Bye, Philipp _______________________________________________ http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion