Re: Removal of 8-bit AVR support (Re: STM32L051 and LPUART)

Hi Ulrich

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:43:14AM +0200, Ulrich Prinz wrote:
> Do _not_misunderstand that!
> 
> I would _never_ design out AVR from the original NutO/S repositories,
> I _forked_ to github and started to plan how to keep the CortexM
> system consistent with the original NutO/S.
> But it is too much work to do that, so I stay on NutO/S and I do _not_
> design out AVR.
> :

Ah, I see.  Thank you for taking the time to clarify this and explaining the
context of the comments.

> Why did I thought about forking:
> :
> [working with ARM CortexM3/CortexM0/etc]

Yes, I see why it was worth the experiment.

> However, it was no plan to rip out the AVR from the original NutO/S!
> :
> Hope I saved you day :)

This is good to know and is a great way to finish my day. :-)  Thanks again.

Regards
  jonathan
_______________________________________________
http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion