Re: cmake for Nut/OS

"Coleman Brumley" <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Dec 2016 15:00:11 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.ethernut
Organization PolarSoft, Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Bonnes [mailto:bon-1JbLm1bU5j5ZIx36JBfelj3+ndqKAYMe9FMPySWZwLkb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 1:18 PM
> To: [email protected]; Ethernut User Chat (English) <en-nut-
> [email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [En-Nut-Discussion] cmake for Nut/OS
> 
> >>>>> "Coleman" == Coleman Brumley <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>     Coleman> In the discussion list, I see old discussions from 2009
>     Coleman> regarding the use of cmake, but it doesn't look like any
>     Coleman> conclusion was posted.
> 
>     Coleman> Was Nut/OS ever updated to work with cmake? There were
>     Coleman> rumblings about a Makefile to cmake utility, but I couldn't
>     Coleman> find a reference to the exact tool.
> 
>     Coleman> The reason for this post is because I'd like to use Visual
GDB
>     Coleman> with Nut/OS, but I can find no way to easily import the
Nut/OS
>     Coleman> ecosystem into Visual GDB.
> 
> I do not know of any more work on that subject neither..
> 
> For a specific setup, probably a CMakeLists.txt can be crafted with not
too
> much fiddling. But as nutconfigure/qnutconf selects the files to compiled,
a
> generic solution will need more work and understanding of ethernut and
> cmake.
> 
> Will you perhaps take a plunge?
> 
> Cheers

Uwe, 

Perhaps. I need to look into what I can do with the stock Makefiles first,
but I should know more in a few days about whether I need cmake or can use
the Makefiles like they are. 

> --
> Uwe Bonnes                bon-1JbLm1bU5j5ZIx36JBfelj3+ndqKAYMe9FMPySWZwLkb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org
> 
> Institut fuer Kernphysik  Schlossgartenstrasse 9  64289 Darmstadt
> --------- Tel. 06151 1623569 ------- Fax. 06151 1623305 ---------

_______________________________________________
http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion