Re: r6796 introduced possible memory leak in os/timer.c

If you have permission to commit to branches you should be able to
commit to the trunk.

By the way, maybe the repository should be moved to github for better
visibility, easier for users to contribute.

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:39 PM Philipp Burch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe!
>
> On 17.01.21 21:50, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
> > I did not think of our poor memory starving AVR8
> > architecture. Changing flags to uint8_r should do no harm (famous last
> > words).
>
> It would certainly be required to also change the #define to 0x80 or
> something that fits in 8 bits. It could then be put to the other flag
> (TM_ONESHOT), so that it doesn't get missed in future updates.
>
> >
> > Where did you apply 6917 and 6918. "git svn rebase" only gives me Ole's
> > change for 6916. Please either apply yourself to master or tell me to
> > do so.
>
> I still keep the Ethernut sources in a pure Subversion repo, didn't make
> the (long due) change to Git yet.
>
> The changes are in the devnut_tiva branch:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/ethernut/code/HEAD/tree/branches/devnut_tiva/
>
> I don't know how the Subversion-Branches are handled by Git, if they are
> in the repo at all.
>
> Best regards,
> Philipp
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion
_______________________________________________
http://lists.egnite.de/mailman/listinfo/en-nut-discussion