Re: Reply-to mangling

Paul B. Webster VK2BZC writes ("Re: [gnupic] Reply-to mangling"):
>  [much verbiage]                          Now Ian chooses in his 
> subsequent post, to refer to this audience as "the computer-ignorant", 
> but really, it means anyone who wishes to use a system in comfort, and 
> have it behave in a (plausibly) predictable fashion, so when I am 
> sitting, supposedly relaxing, following a discussion on a mail list 
> forum, this includes me.

My email client offers me two reply functions: reply to sender, and
reply to all recipients of the original message.  I believe that this
is common in all modern mail clients.

With Reply-To unmunged these functions do what they say.  How is this
difficult to cope with ?

What Reply-To munged they both reply only to the list.  Hence the fact
that we're having this flamewar here.

Ian.