Re: PIC18Forth tester feed back.
David McNab <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.gnupic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for that. If you look at pic18forth, you'll see that it can be configured for anything from single wheel wheelbarrow to large air-conditioned tractor. I hear your concerns about simplicity. But there are situations where on-pic software needs a lot of functionality- eg LCD-based user interfaces, host serial links, controlling other pics etc. Cheers David [email protected] wrote: > As expected from the author, the Pic18Forth documentation is immaculte. > And it is not hidden that a lot of facilities are needed to test it. > > And when I read Chen Xiao Fan's recent post: > Mini Howto: Microchip tools under Linux with Wine, > I really [more so] believe that these tasks are bloating out of control. > > IMO pic made sense as a 18-pin [maximum] DIL. > And since 'pic asm' leads to using many macros, and forth is 'like' > the ultimate macro-multiplyer/controller, and a picforth with > IMO an 'appropriate minimalist view' was available I tried it. > > Right now I'm afraid to open up the PIC18Forth project. > I've never yet even run python. > > A [single wheel] wheel-barrow is a marvelous tool. > But it you start modifying/refining it to ape a luxury passenger > vehicle, it becomes inappropriate/absurd. > > Isn't pic following this inappropriate route ? > > == Chris Glur. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >