Re: [[EE] Resistor power rating
Justin Richards <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:16:48 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKMvr866C3XXV=8ygu2YsVtB8cFEGwhNgN+9+TDCQgNhOHGcSg@mail.gmail.com> |
regarding 5W ceramic resistors, the internet suggested checking and replacing 2 x 5W ceramic resistors that maybe the fault on a (neighbours) 60" tv. To my surprise one tested open cct. I have found failed resistors before but never 5W ceramic and not without any outward signs of stress, Replaced both and neighbour happy. justin On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 2:47 AM David C Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > I need to experiment a little. > Tune for maximum smoke as my compatriot used to say > __________________________________________ > David C Brown > 43 Bings Road > Whaley Bridge > High Peak Phone: 01663 780582 > Derbyshire eMail: [email protected] > *SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > <http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~dcb> * > > > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 at 13:09, Alan Pearce <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Just be careful though, I have had "concrete block" wirewound resistors > > smoke on me. I don't know exactly why but suspect it was something to do > > with peak current at switch on. > > The ones I refer to as "concrete block" are those in a 1" cross section > > ceramic package with a cermet mixture on on side where the element gets > > inserted. > > > > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 at 08:55, David C Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for that. It seems that a 5w wirewound resistor wold easily > meet > > > my requirements > > > __________________________________________ > > > David C Brown > > > 43 Bings Road > > > Whaley Bridge > > > High Peak Phone: 01663 780582 > > > Derbyshire eMail: [email protected] > > > *SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > <http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~dcb> * > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 22:22, Clint Jay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Vishay and Bourns both have info on their wesbites about selecting > > > > resistors for pulse load applications: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.vishay.com/docs/48516/_ms9702509-2401-vishaychecklistpulseload.pdf > > > > https://www.bourns.com/products/resistors/pulse-power-resistors > > > > > > > > On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 19:32, Jason White < > > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > vishay makes some nice pulse rated 2512's that have some graphs > where > > > you > > > > > can look this up in > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 2:09 PM David VanHorn <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Normally, resistor power ratings assume 100% duty cycle, so > 1/0.016 > > > > would > > > > > > be a first approximation, but the part may not be capable of > > > > withstanding > > > > > > that much pulsed power. > > > > > > Unfortunately, the low duty cycle ratings are hard to find on > most > > > > > > resistors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:37 AM David C Brown < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am planning to use a 2R2 resistor to limit the current to a > > > > solenoid > > > > > to > > > > > > > 6amps. > > > > > > > Ohms law says that the power dissipation is about 80watts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But the duration of the current pulse is only 16mS. Does that > > > mean > > > > > > that I > > > > > > > can get away with a lower power rating and, if so, how much > > lower? > > > > > > > __________________________________________ > > > > > > > David C Brown > > > > > > > 43 Bings Road > > > > > > > Whaley Bridge > > > > > > > High Peak Phone: 01663 780582 > > > > > > > Derbyshire eMail: [email protected] > > > > > > > *SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > > > > > <http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~dcb> * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list > archive > > > > > > > View/change your membership options at > > > > > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > > > > View/change your membership options at > > > > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Jason White > > > > > -- > > > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > > > View/change your membership options at > > > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Clint. M0UAW IO83 > > > > > > > > *No trees were harmed in the sending of this mail. However, a large > > > number > > > > of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.* > > > > -- > > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > > View/change your membership options at > > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > View/change your membership options at > > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist