Re: [EE} nano Farads

If they were real historians, they would have listed them as micro micro farads.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Piclist <[email protected]> on behalf of Mark Huffstutter <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2026 3:53:56 PM
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EE} nano Farads

If They were real historians they would have listed them in "puffs"  😀


Mark. K7ZGT
________________________________
From: Piclist <[email protected]> on behalf of Chuck Olson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 9, 2026 7:38 AM
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EE} nano Farads

If Digi-Key was on the ball those caps would have been described as:

4700 uuF

:)

On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 9:23 AM David C Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I ordered some 4700pF polyester capacitors from OneCall and what arrived
> were labeled .0047uF.  And I put them in the drawer labeled 4n7
> __________________________________________
> David C Brown
> 43 Bings Road
> Whaley Bridge
> High Peak                           Phone: 01663 780582
> Derbyshire                eMail: [email protected]
> *SK23 7ND          web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb<http://www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb><http://www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb<http://www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb>>
> <http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~dcb> *
>
>
>
> *Sent from my etch-a-sketch*
>
>
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 at 15:16, Clint Jay <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > RS and Farnell list 4700pF, 4.7nF and 0.0047μF.
> >
> > I think it's because manufacturers list them that way.
> >
> > Clint. M0UAW IO83
> >
> > *No trees were harmed in the sending of this mail. However, a large number
> > of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Feb 2026, 14:57 David C Brown, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Why are some distributors so reluctant to use the unit nanoFarad?
> > >
> > > I have recently sourced some 4,7nF capacitors and they are described by
> > > Digikey as being 4,700pF and by Nerwark as .0047uF
> > >
> > > I find it most confusing
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________
> > > David C Brown
> > > 43 Bings Road
> > > Whaley Bridge
> > > High Peak                           Phone: 01663 780582
> > > Derbyshire                eMail: [email protected]
> > > *SK23 7ND          web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb<http://www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb><http://www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb<http://www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb>>
> > > <http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~dcb> *
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch*
> > > --
> > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > > View/change your membership options at
> > > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> > >
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > View/change your membership options at
> > https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
--
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
-- 
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist