Re: [EE] Re: E-Field viewer
"Brent Brown" <[email protected]> Thu, 2 Jul 2026 10:38:15 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.pic |
|---|---|
| Organization | Electronic Design Solutions |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This seems to be the thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E25aX0w7C7I On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 at 09:17, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I would love to see a video of this E-Field device in action when it is up > and running. > > Cheers, > Martin. > > On Wednesday, 1 July 2026 at 18:09, Sean Breheny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 400kHz at 10kV will ionize and illuminate the gas inside the bulbs > without > > any electrodes. You could probably just have an array of sealed tubes > with > > the appropriate mix of gas at the right pressure inside. Your idea to > just > > clip the wires may be a close enough approximation of this. > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 2:24AM David VanHorn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Picture a grid of 10x10 NE2 lamps, mounted in holes in a wooden board. > > > > > > What I'm after is a good representation of the E-Field around a device. > > > Roughly 400 kHz and 10kV..60kV > > > > > > I am worrying over what would distort the field the least. > > > All leads clipped and just little gas tubes with metal bits inside? > > > All leads connected and grounded with minimal wire? > > > All leads connected to strips of copper tape which is grounded? > > > > > > I think the first one is the least distortion to the field, and least > > > sensitive. Not sure which way to order the other two. > > > > > > Opinions?