RE: One wire jack? What's your preference.

"Kelly Smith" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.microcontrollers.tini
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear NZG - My vote is for the RJ11 for 1-Wire, that is compatible with
pinouts for DalSemi, Systronix, and AAG Electronica products.  There are
"other" products out there for 1-Wire that do not comply (a 1-wire hub comes
to mind), but the volume market appears to be the three noted above, as well
as the "Link" and DS9097U/ product pinouts.

IMHO... Best regards, Kelly Smith

-----Original Message-----
From: tini-admin-6tN4nzCoH/[email protected] [mailto:tini-admin-6tN4nzCoH/[email protected]]On Behalf Of
NZG
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 7:52 AM
To: TINI-6tN4nzCoH/[email protected]
Subject: [TINI]One wire jack? What's your preference.


We are currently working on the new Rev of the SOM100ES Tini Carrier.
On this rev we would like to bring out the one-wire lines into some kind of
jack, but haven't made a decision on what yet.

The Dallas carrier uses an RJ11 jack to bring out the OW network, is this
standard? Does this get routed to OW "hubs" or do users just chop up the
other end of their wire to connect it to individual devices?

Would a screw terminal be better?

What do you think?

thx,
NZG.


_______________________________________________
TINI mailing list
TINI-6tN4nzCoH/[email protected]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, edit your profile, or see list archives:
http://lists.dalsemi.com/mailman/listinfo/tini


_______________________________________________
TINI mailing list
TINI-6tN4nzCoH/[email protected]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, edit your profile, or see list archives:
http://lists.dalsemi.com/mailman/listinfo/tini
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.