Re:
"Sebastian P. Goetze" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABvp6yENPi9jbLm5K4k2xvPKpOEXo-+29ERGzmje0L5fQ7bBoQ@mail.gmail.com> |
And I just double-checked: 9.7p4-p5 is supported on FAS 25xx+ and FAS 80x0+ and all the newer systems. Sebastian On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:41 AM Michael Bergman via Toasters < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Bergman <[email protected]> > To: Toasters <[email protected]> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:38:50 +0000 > Subject: Re: single or multiple aggregates? > On 2020-06-29 21:15, John Stoffel wrote: > > How many volumes are you running in each SVM? But basically in my > > experience it's not too big a deal to have different SVMs sharing > > aggregates. This bigger deal is having SATA vs SAS on the same head, > > at least with older versions. I'm running 9.3 these days and not > > seeing problems. > > Indeed, there's no problem having many vservers share Aggregates. That was > never an issue, really. Certainly not ONTAP 9 and up. And the problem > with > CP processing (WAFL Consistency Point) you mention was solved long ago. > I.e. > mixing 10K rpm and 7.2K rpm Aggregates in the same controller. > Really: 9.7 is a good place to be all in all. It has many carefully > thought > out performance tunings in WAFL and other places which earlier versions do > not have > > /M > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Bergman via Toasters <[email protected]> > To: Toasters <[email protected]> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 23:38:55 +0100 > Subject: > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters