Re: hardware or software based disk ownership?

I always cringe when I see a timid newcomer get spanked and I appreciate 
the tact and diplomacy of your gentle RTFM :)

In this case I'd read the docs on managing aggrs and was confused by the 
system not behaving like I'd expect. Admittedly whatever was going wrong 
was likely carbon-based.

All is well...


On 7/7/2020 3:28 PM, Heino Walther wrote:
>
> Yes aggregates can of cause be shared between multiple SVMs…. (erhm… I 
> think a little polite rtfm is in order here?) 😉
>
> And before you ask, you cannot use the two aggr0 root aggregates for 
> any data volumes…
>
> /Heino
>
> *Fra: *Toasters <[email protected]> på vegne af "Rue, 
> Randy" <[email protected]>
> *Dato: *onsdag den 8. juli 2020 kl. 00.23
> *Til: *tmac <[email protected]>
> *Cc: *Toasters <[email protected]>
> *Emne: *Re: hardware or software based disk ownership?
>
> I think I may just be looking at a limit of the system. If an 
> aggregate is already assigned to one SVM, can it also be assigned to 
> another? That is, can two different SVMs access the same aggregate?
>
> Output:
>
> netapp4::> vserver modify -vserver scharp_vm_storage -aggr-list 
> scharpdata,scharp_vm_storage
>
> netapp4::> vserver show
>                                Admin      Operational Root
> Vserver     Type    Subtype    State      State Volume     Aggregate
> ----------- ------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- 
> ----------
> netapp4     admin   -          -          - -          -
> netapp4-a   node    -          -          - -          -
> netapp4-b   node    -          -          - -          -
> scharp_kube data    default    running    running scharp_    scharpdata
> kube_root
> scharp_vm_storage
>             data    default    running    running scharp_vm_ scharp_vm_
> storage_   storage
>                                                       root
> scharpdata  data    default    running    running scharpdata scharpdata
>                                                       _root
> 6 entries were displayed.
>
> netapp4::>
>
> On 7/7/2020 2:06 PM, tmac wrote:
>
>     Something may be getting lost here. Are you able to send any output?
>
>
>     --tmac
>
>     *Tim McCarthy, */Principal Consultant/
>
>     *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>*
>
>     *I Blog at **TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>*
>
>     On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 4:47 PM Rue, Randy <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         I was misremembering from my early days in pre-cluster mode.
>
>         Forget any mention of disk ownership :)
>
>         Can an aggregate be used by more than one SVM? If so, how?
>         When I try to
>         add the aggregate to the other SVM, the command returns
>         without error
>         but vserver show still shows the SVMS and their assigned
>         aggregates
>         unchanged.
>
>
>         On 7/7/2020 12:10 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
>         > Randy,
>         > Check your configuration, you need to assign the aggregates
>         to the
>         > vservers.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1196912/html/GUID-5255E7D8-F420-4BD3-AEFB-7EF65488C65C.html
>         >
>         > shows you the steps to take.
>         >
>         >        vserver show -fields aggr-list
>         >
>         >        vserver modify -vserver <vserver> -aggr-list
>         <aggr1>,<aggr2>[,aggrN]
>         >
>         > John
>         _______________________________________________
>         Toasters mailing list
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
>

_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters