Re: SFP Compatibility - QLogic CNA 8324 / 9.3.x / FAS2552

Tim McCarthy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.netapp
Message-ID <DM6PR14MB2859A7847BD4D85F097E1599F32F0@DM6PR14MB2859.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
The most important thing is that the item is specifically coded as Cisco

I’ve found most third party twinax that are Cisco coded seem to work in a Netapp

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Toasters <[email protected]> on behalf of Richard Paddock <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 6:17:51 PM
To: jordan slingerland <[email protected]>; Toasters <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: SFP Compatibility - QLogic CNA 8324 / 9.3.x / FAS2552

FS.com is great. I have used them for years now. Just make sure you order the correct compatibility sku. Also, you can reach out to their sales department if you have any questions or need customized orders.


Thank you,
Richard
________________________________
From: Toasters <[email protected]> on behalf of jordan slingerland <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 3:11 PM
To: Toasters <[email protected]>
Subject: SFP Compatibility - QLogic CNA 8324 / 9.3.x / FAS2552



I am wondering if anyone has had any luck using FS.com or other generic SFP.


If unsure, same question for a genuine Cisco GLC-T SFP.


Unfortunately, I am limited to a 1g copper switch here.


FS.com says the Cisco Compatible GLC-T  generic adapters they have will work in a  QLogic CNA 8324 but could not confirm specifically in a Netapp.  Does qual_devices greenlist specific SFP as it does disks?


slot 0: Fibre Channel Target Host Adapter 0d

                (QLogic CNA 8324 (8362) rev. 2, <LINK NOT CONNECTED>)

                Firmware rev:      8.7.0

                Flash rev:         2.1.0



Thanks Toasters,


--Jordan

_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.