Re: 4 node cluster - only two nodes coming up

tmac <[email protected]> Mon, 17 May 2021 14:00:57 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.netapp
Message-ID <CAL9X-_HxuQj1XkCoX7WpbbhprPSeSSHGMZ_ar5Wm_umwsgHg_Q@mail.gmail.com>
I had something like this a while back.

I ended up just creating a new 1GB volume and the converting it to the root
vol (volume make-vsroot)

--tmac

*Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant*

*Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>*

*I Blog at TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>*



On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 8:05 PM John Stoffel <[email protected]> wrote:

> The two nodes came up ok, the problem is the svms with a root ok on the
> missing pair of nodes.  Escalating with netapp.
>
>
> Not sure we have the time to wait for elevator repair to bring the missing
> pair to the new location, ten hours by truck.  Been a hellosh weekend.
>
> I wonder if pod sharing rootvols would have saved us some pain?  Maybe not
> since updates wouldn’t be possible.
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 16, 2021, at 2:18 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> 
> You can only bring up two nodes if one of them has epsilon. Otherwise no
> configuration changes are possible and that includes breaking snap mirror.
>
> If those two nodes do have epsilon, it is just normal procedure to
> failover LIF. After snap mirror break destinations volumes are not renamed
> - they remain exactly as they are. Nothing special needs to be done when
> two remaining nodes arrive - they just join cluster normally.
>
> If these two nodes do not have epsilon, your best bet is to wait for the
> remaining cluster nodes to arrive. I am not aware of possibility to force
> epsilon in this case. May be it exists, but you certainly need support case
> to obtain it and any follow up step.
>
> Скачайте Outlook для iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ------------------------------
> *От:* Пользователь Toasters <[email protected]> от имени
> пользователя John Stoffel <[email protected]>
> *Отправлено:* воскресенье, мая 16, 2021 04:54
> *Кому:* <[email protected]>
> *Тема:* 4 node cluster - only two nodes coming up
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We're in the middle of hell, where our 4-node FAS8060 cluster was
> shutdown cleanly for a move, but only one pair made it onto the truck
> to the new DC.  Luckily I have all the volumes snapmirrored between
> the two pairs of nodes and their aggregates.
>
> But now I need to bring up the pair that made the trip, figure out
> which mirrors are source and which are destination on this pair, and
> then break the destination ones so I can promote them to read-write.
>
> This is not something I've practiced, and I wonder that if I have
> volume foo, mounted on /foo, and it's snapmirror is volume foo_sm,
> when I do the break, will it automatically mount to /foo?  I guess
> I'll find out later tonight, and I can just unmount and remount.
>
> I think this is all good with just a simple 'snapmirror break ...' but
> then when we get the chance to rejoin the other two nodes into the
> cluster down the line, I would asusme I just have to (maybe) wipe the
> old nodes and rejoin them one at a time.  Mostly because by that point
> I can't have the original source volumes come up and cause us to lose
> all the writes that have happened on the now writeable destination
> volumes.
>
> And of course there's the matter of getting epsilon back up and
> working on the two node cluster when I reboot it.  Along with all the
> LIFs, etc.  Not going to be a fun time.  Not at all...
>
> And of course we're out of support with Netapp.  Sigh...
>
> And who knows if the pair that came down won't lose some disks and end
> up losing one or more aggregates as well.  Stressful times for sure.
>
> So I'm just venting here, but any suggestions or tricks would be
> helpful.
>
> And of course I'm not sure if the cluster switches made it down here
> yet.
>
> Never put your DC on the second floor if there isn't a second freight
> elevator.  Or elevator in general.  Sigh...
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> Toasters mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
>
> _______________________________________________
> Toasters mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters