Re: 4 node cluster - only two nodes coming up
tmac <[email protected]> Mon, 17 May 2021 14:00:57 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9X-_HxuQj1XkCoX7WpbbhprPSeSSHGMZ_ar5Wm_umwsgHg_Q@mail.gmail.com> |
I had something like this a while back. I ended up just creating a new 1GB volume and the converting it to the root vol (volume make-vsroot) --tmac *Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant* *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>* *I Blog at TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>* On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 8:05 PM John Stoffel <[email protected]> wrote: > The two nodes came up ok, the problem is the svms with a root ok on the > missing pair of nodes. Escalating with netapp. > > > Not sure we have the time to wait for elevator repair to bring the missing > pair to the new location, ten hours by truck. Been a hellosh weekend. > > I wonder if pod sharing rootvols would have saved us some pain? Maybe not > since updates wouldn’t be possible. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 16, 2021, at 2:18 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > You can only bring up two nodes if one of them has epsilon. Otherwise no > configuration changes are possible and that includes breaking snap mirror. > > If those two nodes do have epsilon, it is just normal procedure to > failover LIF. After snap mirror break destinations volumes are not renamed > - they remain exactly as they are. Nothing special needs to be done when > two remaining nodes arrive - they just join cluster normally. > > If these two nodes do not have epsilon, your best bet is to wait for the > remaining cluster nodes to arrive. I am not aware of possibility to force > epsilon in this case. May be it exists, but you certainly need support case > to obtain it and any follow up step. > > Скачайте Outlook для iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > ------------------------------ > *От:* Пользователь Toasters <[email protected]> от имени > пользователя John Stoffel <[email protected]> > *Отправлено:* воскресенье, мая 16, 2021 04:54 > *Кому:* <[email protected]> > *Тема:* 4 node cluster - only two nodes coming up > > > > Hi all, > > We're in the middle of hell, where our 4-node FAS8060 cluster was > shutdown cleanly for a move, but only one pair made it onto the truck > to the new DC. Luckily I have all the volumes snapmirrored between > the two pairs of nodes and their aggregates. > > But now I need to bring up the pair that made the trip, figure out > which mirrors are source and which are destination on this pair, and > then break the destination ones so I can promote them to read-write. > > This is not something I've practiced, and I wonder that if I have > volume foo, mounted on /foo, and it's snapmirror is volume foo_sm, > when I do the break, will it automatically mount to /foo? I guess > I'll find out later tonight, and I can just unmount and remount. > > I think this is all good with just a simple 'snapmirror break ...' but > then when we get the chance to rejoin the other two nodes into the > cluster down the line, I would asusme I just have to (maybe) wipe the > old nodes and rejoin them one at a time. Mostly because by that point > I can't have the original source volumes come up and cause us to lose > all the writes that have happened on the now writeable destination > volumes. > > And of course there's the matter of getting epsilon back up and > working on the two node cluster when I reboot it. Along with all the > LIFs, etc. Not going to be a fun time. Not at all... > > And of course we're out of support with Netapp. Sigh... > > And who knows if the pair that came down won't lose some disks and end > up losing one or more aggregates as well. Stressful times for sure. > > So I'm just venting here, but any suggestions or tricks would be > helpful. > > And of course I'm not sure if the cluster switches made it down here > yet. > > Never put your DC on the second floor if there isn't a second freight > elevator. Or elevator in general. Sigh... > > John > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters