Re:

tmac <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:46:16 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.netapp
Message-ID <CAL9X-_ETt5t7H=q1+a7a5oXZJDYAOecctrTj3=P5ah4BxSv_mg@mail.gmail.com>
So far it has been very good to me.
I am having my air-gapped customers move to this. We avoided 9.8-9.8P2. P3
came out but was quickly followed by P4.

--tmac

*Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant*

*Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>*




On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:16 PM Brian Parent via Toasters <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brian Parent <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:12:03 -0700
> Subject: 9.7P12 vs. 9.8P4 ??
> We're at 9.7P12 now.  I've got a day or two to decide whether to jump to
> 9.8P4, and stay there.
> Our AFF8020 apparently isn't qualified for 9.9RC1.
> I'm retiring in two weeks, and the crew I'm leaving behind (sorry, not
> sorry), doesn't have experience upgrading NetApps.  They plan to leave it
> as is until they can decommission it in 6-12 months.
>
> It seems like a good idea to move to 9.8P4 due to the openSSL bug fixes.
> Any horror stories about 9.8P4?
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Brian Parent via Toasters <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:12:24 +0100
> Subject:
> _______________________________________________
> Toasters mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters

_______________________________________________
Toasters mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters