Re:
tmac <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:46:16 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9X-_ETt5t7H=q1+a7a5oXZJDYAOecctrTj3=P5ah4BxSv_mg@mail.gmail.com> |
So far it has been very good to me. I am having my air-gapped customers move to this. We avoided 9.8-9.8P2. P3 came out but was quickly followed by P4. --tmac *Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant* *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>* On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:16 PM Brian Parent via Toasters < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Brian Parent <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 09:12:03 -0700 > Subject: 9.7P12 vs. 9.8P4 ?? > We're at 9.7P12 now. I've got a day or two to decide whether to jump to > 9.8P4, and stay there. > Our AFF8020 apparently isn't qualified for 9.9RC1. > I'm retiring in two weeks, and the crew I'm leaving behind (sorry, not > sorry), doesn't have experience upgrading NetApps. They plan to leave it > as is until they can decommission it in 6-12 months. > > It seems like a good idea to move to 9.8P4 due to the openSSL bug fixes. > Any horror stories about 9.8P4? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Brian Parent via Toasters <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:12:24 +0100 > Subject: > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters