Re: space reporting on AFF's with compression?
tmac <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jul 2021 23:18:43 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL9X-_HbOSV+xjUy-FKtw8D13Dh+NOQSEST15_rZj45-ahAmRQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Those super large artificial numbers: Basically, if you were to rehydrate *all* the snapshots on the system, I think that is the amount of space it would consume. I am not a fan, more of a marketing gimmick. i wish/hope it changes. I see questions on it way too much --tmac *Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant* *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>* *I Blog at TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>* On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 3:21 PM Jeff Bryer <[email protected]> wrote: > I would assume that when NetApp promised you 3x savings they weren't > > referring to just compression. The AFF also does in-line deduplication, > plus > > there is compaction. And some things also count in savings from snapshots. > > > The 180x number, is that in the circle on the tiers page? If you hover > over it, > > it will show the value without snapshots counted. > > > If you want a better break down try using (CLI): > > aggr show-efficiency -aggregate aggr -instance > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Toasters <[email protected]> on behalf of Rue, Randy < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 6, 2021 11:51 AM > *To:* Toasters > *Subject:* Re: space reporting on AFF's with compression? > > also, that pane says I'm getting 108X data reduction. Is that the new > inline compression? And is that number likely to be accurate after > NetApp promised us (in writing!) compression? > > On 7/6/2021 11:42 AM, Rue, Randy wrote: > > OK, no responses to my below so let me ask a simpler question. > > > > The System Manager Dashboard's "Capacity" pane says I'm using 1.83PB > > with 11.7TB available. That's clearly not accurate. > > > > If I click into the arrow in that pane I get the Tiers page and it > > says my two Tiers respectively have 875TB used and 6.5TB available, > > and 1PB used and 5.2TB available. > > > > What the hell are these numbers describing? > > > > > > Hope to hear from you > > > > > > On 6/10/2021 9:24 AM, Rue, Randy wrote: > >> Hello All, > >> > >> We're migrating from a FAS to a new AFF that has inline compression > >> and a guarantee of 3X compression. > >> > >> I'm trying to convert a graphite/snmp graphing system that reports > >> our overall aggregate space usage to the new system. > >> > >> A straightforward graph of used and free space on the data > >> aggregates/tiers shows the right portion of space used but seems to > >> be reporting pre-compression usage (and we appear to be getting less > >> than 3X). > >> > >> The System Manager webUI says we're getting ~120:1 "Data Reduction" > >> but it also says we're using 1.74PB and have 14TB available. In fact > >> we currently have 48 x 900GB SSDs in two disk groups/tiers and about > >> 40TB of actual unstructured data. > >> > >> Is there a doc somewhere on understanding space reporting with the > >> new system including meaningful reporting of compression returns? > >> > >> > >> Grateful for any help, > >> > >> Randy in Seattle > >> > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters