Re: Upgrade to what?
Sebastian Goetze <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:05:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Depends on your HW: * Ancient: e.g. 22xx, 32xx, 62xx up to 9.1p20 * Old: e.g. 25xx, 80xx, A200 up to 9.8p6+ * Current: anything later, e.g. A220+, FAS26xx+ up to 9.9.1p2+ On 21.09.2021 03:44, Kuber Sharma wrote: > What version of ONTAP can I upgrade to: > > https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/upgrade/concept_upgrade_paths.html > > Cheer, > Kuber > > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 11:30 AM Philbert Rupkins > <[email protected]> wrote: > > 9.3 -> 9.7 is a supported "direct" ANDU path, per Upgrade Advisor. > > It involves both loading both the 9.5 and 9.7 packages in to the > repository but just one ANDU required to make that jump. Each > node is upgraded twice (9.3->9.5;9.5->9.7) as the ANDU rolls > through the cluster as I understand it. > > Thanks for the feedback on System Manager. I'm used to kicking it > off from the CLI so I'll just stick with that. > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 6:41 PM tmac <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is. For sure. But once on 9.5, you can load 9.7Px and 9.8PX > on the system and it will do the auto-update from 9.5 -> 9.7Px > -> 9.8Px > > One will have to do the 9.3 -> 9.5Px step first though. > > --tmac > > *Tim McCarthy, */Principal Consultant/ > > *Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam > <https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam>* > > *I Blog at TMACsRack <https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/>* > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 6:45 PM Mike Gossett > <[email protected]> wrote: > > 9.5 is definitely a needed interim step. > > >> On Sep 20, 2021, at 5:40 PM, Tim McCarthy >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I think you need to be on at least 9.5 to punch through >> to higher releases. >> >> The 9.3 to 9.5 with system manager is very manageable. >> Even if you were to start the upgrade with the cli you >> can still go to the gui upgrade page and watch the progress. >> >> I only end up at the cli in the event of an issue. >> cluster image show-update-progress >> Is your friend. >> >> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* Philbert Rupkins <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, September 20, 2021 4:46:19 PM >> *To:* Tim McCarthy <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* Douglas Siggins <[email protected]>; Toasters >> <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: Upgrade from 9.3 to 9.7 >> Going to resurrect this thread from the ashes. A couple >> of questions: >> >> Just a quick poll - how many of you are performing >> rolling ANDU upgrades via System Manager? I see it is >> documented as the "preferred" ANDU method despite Upgrade >> Avisor walking through the CLI based steps. >> >> /"You can also perform an automated upgrade using the >> command line interface (CLI); however, >> / >> /using ONTAP System Manager is preferred."/ >> / >> / >> /https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMLP2876872/ >> / >> / >> Also, is the System Manager method available if >> performing the double/direct upgrade from 9.3->9.7? >> >> Thanks, >> Phil >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 11:10 AM Tim McCarthy >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Always reboot those sp/bmc before attempting any >> upgrade. It usually solves the SP update process from >> failing ! >> >> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* Toasters <[email protected]> on >> behalf of Douglas Siggins <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Saturday, August 14, 2021 11:28:53 AM >> *To:* Philbert Rupkins <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* Toasters <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: Upgrade from 9.3 to 9.7 >> Works well check your cluster switch firmware >> versions, and upgrade your SPs directly prior if >> supported. I've seen many instances of SP hangs when >> we went through that process over a year ago >> (hundreds of nodes). Overall 9.7 is a great stable >> version. >> >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 3:05 PM Philbert Rupkins >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello Toasters, >> >> Anybody have experience, positive or negative, >> upgrading from 9.3 to 9.7? >> >> It is a supported automated upgrade path but >> requires packages for >> both 9.5 and 9.7. My understanding is each node >> will be upgraded >> twice (once to 9.5 then to 9.7) but otherwise >> should follow the >> typical automated upgrade routine. >> >> Thank You >> Phil >> _______________________________________________ >> Toasters mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Toasters mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters