Re: [EXTERNAL] experience with standard PD layer using CVO?
Scott Miller <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Aug 2022 13:46:36 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.netapp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANZzY9N47=WxjcM0O7VN9y0YGkCtAM2Gvt-BNE_U5s+sBCKWjQ@mail.gmail.com> |
CVO == Cloud Volumes Ontap, the software version of OnTap that you can run in the various CSP's (Cloud Service Providers) aka GCP, AWS, Azure https://cloud.netapp.com/ontap-cloud PD == Persistent Disk, what GCP (Google Compute Platform) calls its, uh, persistent disks. https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/disks And to answer Jeffs question, we've not done any CVO testing in GCP, so I can't answer the throughput questions. We have found that, in general, the VM Instance type that hosts the CVO instances matters, since the Instance type also determines networking connectivity. Disk type (in this case GCP PDs) matters, too; I'd test with Local SSD to see where that gets you. Lastly, Throughput is dependent on workload, which determines the IO pattern. Maybe create an FIO config that generates traffic close to what you expect, and use that to drive various CVO configurations. https://github.com/axboe/fio -Skottie On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 1:26 PM John Stoffel <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Mohler via Toasters <[email protected]> writes: > > Jeff> From: Jeff Mohler <[email protected]> > Jeff> To: Toasters <[email protected]> > Jeff> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 10:15:13 -0700 > Jeff> Subject: CVO on Standard/SATA PD > > Jeff> Does anyone here have experience on a standard PD layer using CVO? > > Jeff, I know you're deep in the weeds, but for those of us who > aren't... can you spell out those acronyms please? > > PD = Purple Dinosaur? > CVO = Cheery Victory Orange? > > *grin* > > > Jeff> If so, I am looking for -throughput- maximus, limitations, > Jeff> lessons learned, on per volume write workloads. > > Jeff> We are in a mode where we believe we were told there are > Jeff> 100-200MB/sec write "edges" of throughput to CVO on standard PD > Jeff> storage...just we're not quite in shape here to test that yet > Jeff> ourselves. > > Yeah, you need to translate this section as well please. Or at least > give a little more context so people have a hope of understanding. Or > better yet, learning from your experiences! > > Cheers, > John > > _______________________________________________ > Toasters mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters > _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list [email protected] https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters