Re: Moderation
Michael Hayder <[email protected]> 11 Aug 2003 17:00:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.openbrick.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1060614015.1368.9.camel@localhost> |
Am Don, 2003-08-07 um 12.02 schrieb Thomas Arendsen Hein: > Hi! > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:48:13AM +0200, Jean-Paul Smets wrote: > > I know the delay is long (I am now on holiday in spain) but moderation is > > really required because of spam and advertising. > > Spam can be prevented by allowing only subscribed addresses to post. > Other addresses will then be held for approval as now every mail is. > Not @ all. As far as I know you have a webinterface for the maillinglist, which makes it possible to view the thread(s) of the maillinglist via web. There is the problem !!! I have searched fpr my unique name [email protected] and I found my adress many times in the web. There is comming a webharvester and collects the email adresses. And the spam is in. Please build a webinterface which removes all email-adresses in the list-view. They are not nessesary to view the content I drop all messages from your mailinglist without [openbrick] in the subject.... and I check the IP also ... before I did this 5 spam mails every day .... now there is no one... (rbl etc protection etc....) > The other problem is advertising from subscribed users. But how > much can this be? And banning such people from the list would be an > option, too. > You can get them also with the subject.... > > So, I suggest another solution. There should be many moderators to the list. > > Our mailman installation runs SpamAssassin to lower the number of > mails to discard. I can provide you with details how to set this up > after my vacation (that is at the end of August). > :-> .... not usefull .... good spammers are sending coded words so spam assasin would not work correct.... use a harded m ailserver like qmail and use the tools deliverd with it ... rblcheck,dnsreverse check etc. greets mic > > Please let me know if you want to act as moderator (it consumes time). > > It would consume less time when you don't have to approve every mail :) > > I think adding me (and other trusted people) as moderators can't > make things worse. Even if I only can spend 10-20 minutes per week, > it can only get better. > > So yes, please add me as a moderator. And consider allowing posts > from subscribed addresses while not allowing to be subscribed > without approval. > > Thomas