Re: Moderation

Michael Hayder <[email protected]> 11 Aug 2003 17:00:16 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.openbrick.general
Message-ID <1060614015.1368.9.camel@localhost>
Am Don, 2003-08-07 um 12.02 schrieb Thomas Arendsen Hein:
> Hi!
> 
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:48:13AM +0200, Jean-Paul Smets wrote:
> > I know the delay is long (I am now on holiday in spain) but moderation is 
> > really required because of spam and advertising.
> 
> Spam can be prevented by allowing only subscribed addresses to post.
> Other addresses will then be held for approval as now every mail is.
> 
Not @ all. As far as I know you have a webinterface for the
maillinglist, which makes it possible to view the thread(s)
of the maillinglist via web.
There is the problem !!! I have searched fpr my unique name 
[email protected] and I found my adress many times in the web.
There is comming a webharvester and collects the email adresses. And the
spam is in.

Please build a webinterface which removes all email-adresses in the
list-view.  They are not nessesary to view the content

I drop all messages from your mailinglist without [openbrick] in the
subject.... and I check the IP also ... before I did this 5 spam mails
every day .... now there is no one... (rbl etc protection etc....)


> The other problem is advertising from subscribed users. But how
> much can this be? And banning such people from the list would be an
> option, too.
> 
You can get them also with the subject....

> > So, I suggest another solution. There should be many moderators to the list. 
> 
> Our mailman installation runs SpamAssassin to lower the number of
> mails to discard. I can provide you with details how to set this up
> after my vacation (that is at the end of August).
> 
:-> ....  not usefull .... good spammers are sending coded words so spam
assasin would not work correct.... use a harded m ailserver like qmail
and use the tools deliverd with it ... rblcheck,dnsreverse check etc. 
greets
mic

> > Please let me know if you want to act as moderator (it consumes time).
> 
> It would consume less time when you don't have to approve every mail :)
> 
> I think adding me (and other trusted people) as moderators can't
> make things worse. Even if I only can spend 10-20 minutes per week,
> it can only get better.
> 
> So yes, please add me as a moderator. And consider allowing posts
> from subscribed addresses while not allowing to be subscribed
> without approval.
> 
> Thomas