Re: UPnP Port Forwarding / Mapping

"Phil D [email protected] [rabbit-semi]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.rabbit-semiconductor
Message-ID <CAL8BBoOQWv0NuUd84SUMb1Dt8M0STGfx9E+_1RviB778LBhgXw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Agustin,

Have you considered doing the communications so no port forwarding is
required? have the end device connect to an external server and
update/upload any data required periodically or with a tcp connection that
is kept open for real time communication.


Phil




On 3 Nov 2014 01:42, "[email protected] [rabbit-semi]" <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've developed a product using a RCM4300 board that hosts an embedded web
> page to show some parameters of a machine (pressures, temperatures, etc...).
>
> In 90% of the cases the connection scheme is RCM4300 -> (Router ->) Modem
> -> Internet. No big companies with IT departments... it's just like a home
> connection, because the machines are in the field.
>
> In order to be able to access the board from the internet, the RCM4300 has
> a static LAN IP address (for example 192.168.1.50) and the user needs to
> map the port on the router (for example forward external port 12345
> to 192.168.1.50 : 80). This works fine.
>
> I want to do the mapping of the port from the RCM4300 board using UPnP. I
> think it's possible because I've found an example for Arduino (I haven't
> tried, though).
>
> Before developing a library I would like to hear your opinion about this
> matter as I think it's a very common situation that many of you may have
> experienced. May be the library is already developed or may be there is a
> downside I haven't considered...
>
> Thank you for your help!
>
> Agustin
>
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.