RE: Review of HD1000 at Digital Producer. (Notentirely positive)
"Rabi Satter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.roku.technical |
|---|---|
| Organization | HAGeeks.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have looked at a bunch of these convergence devices. This is the first one that actually out preformed its official feature set. The only issues I have with the unit are the remote and the lack of a serial or network protocol. Yes I know about ecp but screen scrapping is not my idea of a protocol and the majority of home integrators are not up to the task of scripting a Linux box via telnet. If they were we would have had the Jetson home last century. _____ From: Bart Harrison [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:19 PM To: Roku Tech Mail List and Discussion Group Subject: Re: [Roku-tech] Review of HD1000 at Digital Producer. (Notentirely positive) Charlie White has been known to review components/equipment without regards as to whether or not it's the current software rev or even the current hardware version. I site a Pinnacle CineWave review he did a couple years ago based on old software and even older (dis)information. In the case of the HD-1000, publicly passing judgement on a complete product line based on his experience with one obviously defective individual unit is thoroughly unprofessional in my opinion. Maybe there are a few bad ones out there, but that's a quality control issue not a design problem (as he implies) ! I've worked with at-least six or eight different HD-1000 boxes and I've never seen one that was the least bit unstable. I push these critters to the limit too, often playing 30 to 40 megabit 1080i HD materials sometimes for days and weeks at a time. My HD-1000's have been completely stable and reliable. Sorry (about yours) Charlie ! Why don't you return that defective unit for a healthy replacement (there is a 30 day return/replacement policy) and do an honest review of the product ? Or is it just more fun (more lucrative) to trash a piece of equipment just because you're in the position to do so ??? Bart P.S. I'm cancelling my subscription to the DMN newsletter effective today !!! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bart Harrison MPA - The HD Suite HD Editing Systems, Consulting, Production & Post, Exhibition & Distribution www.hdsuite.com <http://www.hdsuite.com/> 954-894-1221 At 11:44 AM 5/28/2004 +1200, you wrote: http://www.digitalproducer.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=25831-0 The reviewer clearly had alot of difficulty with the unit crashing, and also commented that the response times were very slow, and that the interface left much to be desired. I haven't yet played with an HD1000 myself, so I'm not in a position to comment on the issues raised here. Is this maybe an earlier release of the OS, or are these known bugs that are being addressed? I'm still keen to get one of these for my clients, based solely on the screensaver feature, and from having read this reveiw it seems the screensaver is not affected by the problems the reviewer had. Cheers, Hamish _______________________________________________ Roku-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rokulabs.com/mailman/listinfo/roku-tech _______________________________________________ Roku-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rokulabs.com/mailman/listinfo/roku-tech