Re: Roku-tech Digest, Vol 10, Issue 17

In a perfect world (is there such a thing?), OOO messages are sent with 
a priority of "junk" (the responsibility is that of the email provider) 
and the mailing list distributor sees the "junk" designation and 
doesn't forward to the list.

roku should implement the latter; as stated above, the initial "junk" 
designation is something each of us should make sure our email 
providers provide.

I go away a lot, and am on lots of mailing lists, and only once in a 
blue moon do I get a message saying that my OOO message has spammed a 
list.  [email protected] can often give hints about the details 
of implementing all this stuff.  Or just google a bit.

Getting upset and advocating tossing a well-intentioned list member off 
a list in the midst of jillions of messages offering to cure our 
apparently-common anatomical deficiencies seems misdirected to me.

Tom Spraggins
[email protected]


>> I apoligize sincerely for not unsubscribing from this list before
>> leaving... I honestly thought I had unsubscribed from all of my lists
>> before setting up the auto-reply, I just forgot this one.  I don't
>> use Outlook, it was from a web client, and I didn't realize it would
>> send to the same sender repeatedly.