AAC or MP3
Peter Gutbrod <[email protected]> Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:50:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.roku.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BD481223.30B21%[email protected]> |
Apple features AAC obviously, but that might be not because of better quality/compression but because they need a DRM capable file format for their Music Store. Slim Devices recommends to use high quality MP3 for their Slimserver/Squeezebox, as AAC needs much more bandwidth and/or CPU time on the server to stream de-/recompressed AAC to the client ( Squeezebox or Soundbridge). Well, Roku managed to uncompress AAC in the Soundbridge, so there is no drawback with AAC in compare to MP3 like with Slimserver. What format do you (Roku or users) prefer to use with the Soundbridge, and why? Let me start with an argument pro MP3: Most (all?) MP3-CD/DVD player cannot read AAC files. To make a MP3 CD you have to convert your selected AAC files to MP3, burn the CD and delete the MP3 (or have f.e. TOAST make the conversion). That takes much more time and is not as easy as just burning a CD in iTunes from MP3 tracks. Peter