| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.discuss |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
Who said I'm not using interrupts? The whole UART thing is interrupt driven....
---In [email protected], <Marty@...> wrote :
I love getting under your skin. Maybe troll would be more accurate. I bet you are waiting for me to reply as your blood pressure goes up. Maybe I will answer your next email and maybe not… You never know troll…
From: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 4:28 PM
To: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [msp430] MSP430F5528 - Clock and UART
Who's bullying, I'm pointing out a simple fact, and asking a valid question, over the years I've been in this group one point seems to dominate here. The vast majorioty of people are scared of using interrupts, especially C programmers.
Bullying requires some form of abuse. Get your facts right before you make pointless off topic comments.
Al
On 18/02/2015 9:46 AM, Martin Bruner Marty@... mailto:Marty@... [msp430] wrote:
Spelling is important when bullying someone online.
From: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 4:02 PM
To: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [msp430] MSP430F5528 - Clock and UART
Well typing can be difficult when you only have limited use of your hands. I'll try to do better next time.
Al
On 18/02/2015 8:46 AM, Martin Bruner Marty@... mailto:Marty@... [msp430] wrote:
I believe you were looking for “frightening” not “fightening".
From: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Reply-To: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 3:07 PM
To: "msp430@yahoogroups. com" <[email protected] mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [msp430] MSP430F5528 - Clock and UART
Why oh why are you bit banging this when the MSP430 has an extremely simple UART in hardware. Are interrupts that fightening?
Al
On 18/02/2015 2:21 AM, mikemalgin@... mailto:mikemalgin@... [msp430] wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to communicate with my RF module through UART interface. However, I get many errors even with low load. I suspect that I have an issue with the way that I configure the clock or the UART.
Basically, for the UART functionality I use http://glitovsky.com/blog/?p=300 http://glitovsky.com/blog/?p=300
(I configured the connection as 8N1at 115200).
The clock configuration below is used with MCLK = 25 MHz ( when I use it with MCLK=16 MHz I cannot communicate with the UART module at all ) .
P5SEL |= 0x0C;
/* Select REF0 for FLL reference. */
UCSCTL3 &= ~SELREF_7;
UCSCTL3 |= SELREF_2;
/* Set ACLK to use REF0CLK.
* Set SMCLK to use the DCO.
*/
UCSCTL4 &= ~SELA_7 & ~SELS_7 & ~SELM_7;
UCSCTL4 |= SELA_2 | SELS_4 | SELM_4;
/* Initialize FLL. */
Init_FLL_Settle(mclk/1000L, mclk/32768);
XT2_Start(XT2DRIVE_0);
UCSCTL4 &= ~SELA_7;
UCSCTL4 |= SELA_2;
UCSCTL8 |= SMCLKREQEN | MCLKREQEN | ACLKREQEN;
/* Enable interrupt for TBCCR0. */
TBCCTL0 = CCIE;
/* Number of ticks per millisecond. */
clock.aclk = 32768;
clock.ticks_per_interrupt = clock.aclk / 1000;
TBCCR0 = clock.ticks_per_interrupt;
/* Use ACLK, set timer to up-count mode, and start timer at zero. */
TBCTL = TBSSEL_1 | MC_2 | TBCLR;
/* Enable interrupts. */
__bis_SR_register(GIE);
Thanks,
Mike