Re: Cycle Counting--Too Many
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.discuss |
|---|---|
| Organization | Infinite Factors |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I know it makes sense that "xor.b #0x1,&P1OUT" should be 4 cycles, given the constant generator. But can you find the specific statement in the Family Guide that mentions using the constant generator, instead of an inline constant, requires one less clock than it would if the constant were say #0xDD? I just looked at SLAA0024 on TI's web site, looking at a table on page 9-24, section 9.3.1, and it looks to me like it is still 5 cycles. If I'm reading this correctly, then that is at least one tiny detail to start the process of accounting for differences. I haven't spent more than 10 minutes yet, though. Just a quick scan and then dragging up the PDFs for a moment. The other thing that crosses my mind is if there might be a few SMCLKs involved after the LPM mode bits are changed to sleep the CPU. Do you know if there is a paper around where counting SMCLK cycles at a pin is addressed when going into sleep, or coming out? I don't recall reading one, but perhaps looking for one might also help resolve the question. Meanwhile, if something else comes to mind I'll post it. Jon ------------------------------------ Posted by: Jon Kirwan <[email protected]> ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the msp430 group, send an email to: [email protected]