RE: RE: Choice of compiler for MSP432
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Matthias -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 27 November 2015 5:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [msp430] RE: Choice of compiler for MSP432 "'Peter Grey' [email protected] [msp430]" <[email protected]>: > Paul > > > > Thanks for the information. I thought there were some issues with you > supporting this initially or were these all resolved? I will take a > look at this. Do you want to do any more sales work and explain why > yours is so good? > I am using Crossworks for MSP430 since years, it is quite good. One point is the much better compiled code compared to gcc based compilers. (but I can not say something about the MSP432 quality). Matthias ------------------------------------ Posted by: Matthias Weingart <[email protected]> ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the msp430 group, send an email to: [email protected] ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links ------------------------------------ Posted by: "Peter Grey" <[email protected]> ------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the msp430 group, send an email to: [email protected]