Re: msp430-gcc 4.7 bug with shifts?
Peter Bigot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.gcc.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPOJ94OoqDnB17h282SzkX-mkr8NGgLrA0cW6pi+girPwv5SJA@mail.gmail.com> |
That looks like a bug. Only happens on CPUX architectures. If you open up a ticket on https://sourceforge.net/p/mspgcc/bugs/ I may be able to look at it some time. Peter On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Daniele Alessandrelli < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I noticed a strange behavior when executing certain shift operations and I > wonder whether this is because of a compiler bug or just my ignorance in > low-level C. > > For example, when compiling (with no optimization) and then executing the > following lines of code the result I obtain is 16 instead of 64: > > uint32_t u32_var; > > int main(void) > { > int tmp; > ... > u32_var = 0xa; > tmp = 16 << (u32_var & 0x07); > printf("tmp: %d\n", tmp); > ... > } > > However, if I change the type of tmp form "int" to "unsigned int" the > result is correct (i.e., 64). > > This is assembly code generated when tmp is defined as int (i.e., when the > result is wrong). > > 5c44: b2 40 0a 00 mov #10, &0x1c02 ;#0x000a > > 5c48: 02 1c > > 5c4a: 82 43 04 1c mov #0, &0x1c04 ;r3 As==00 > > 5c4e: 1e 42 02 1c mov &0x1c02,r14 > > 5c52: 1f 42 04 1c mov &0x1c04,r15 > > 5c56: 0f 4e mov r14, r15 > > 5c58: 3f f0 07 00 and #7, r15 ;#0x0007 > > 5c5c: 3e 40 10 00 mov #16, r14 ;#0x0010 > > 5c60: 4f 4f mov.b r15, r15 > > 5c62: 7f f0 0f 00 and.b #15, r15 ;#0x000f > > 5c66: 84 4e fc ff mov r14, -4(r4) ;0xfffc(r4) > > 5c6a: 4f 93 tst.b r15 > > 5c6c: 03 24 jz $+8 ;abs 0x5c74 > > 5c6e: 7f 53 add.b #-1, r15 ;r3 As==11 > > 5c70: cf 18 0e 5e .rpt r15 > > addx r14, r14 > > 5c74: 14 12 fc ff push -4(r4) ;0xfffc(r4) > > 5c78: 30 12 9a 66 push #26266 ;#0x669a > > 5c7c: b0 12 ae 5c call #0x5cae > > > As you can see, at address 0x5c66, register 14 (containing 16) is stored in > memory before being shifted. The stored valued (i.e., 16) is then pushed in > the stack (i.e., passed as an argument to the printf() function). > > I have a similar problem also when using -Os, but I can't replicate it with > simple code because of the optimization. However, if needed, I can post the > (large) source code that is giving me this problem. > > The version of msp430-gcc that I am using is: > msp430-gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120322 (mspgcc dev 20120911) > > Thank you for any help you can provide. > > Regards. > > Daniele > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: > > Build for Windows Store. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Mspgcc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users