Re: mspgcc Red Hat release

As Brendan notes I'm excluded from TI and Red Hat's collaboration so have
been unable to ease this transition in the ways that I had planned at the
time it was announced.

Best to just leave it at that.

Peter

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Brendan Conoboy <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 07/05/2013 11:24 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > Kudos to Peter Bigot for maintaining MSP430 toolchain for so long and
> > for getting it to the level of support that it has today. Kudos also
> > to RedHat people like Brendan Conoboy for committing to  ongoing
> > support.
> >
> > Having said that, could I suggest some public or private coordination
> > between the two teams?  Peter has extensive knowledge of this
> > toolchain and I'm sure that anyone working in this area would benefit
> > from his advice---but I have a sense that he is not involved with
> > whatever is happening at RedHat. In the interest of the MSP430
> > community, could you guys brief each other on your plans and such? I
> > have a feeling that this is something doable via a fairly short phone
> > conversation.
>
> Peter and I had a nice chat early on, but out of necessity we did the
> port without his considerable expertise.  I think gcc is just about
> ready to be checked in, at which point the upstream sources will be
> complete and available for everybody to use without special patching.
> Once that completes, I will send a note, but also: I would like to
> encourage everybody who wants to contribute to the new tools to submit
> their patches upstream: This makes sure every future release is the best
> release ever.
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users