Re: Unofficial Red Hat Port
Brendan Conoboy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.texas-instruments.msp430.gcc.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/13/2013 11:37 AM, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > If we've got to that point then I may be able to assist in making that > happen, but there were some concerns that those using the old packages > may not be ready to move to the new ones right away - so it would be > nice to hear some thoughts on that. Should we do it now, or wait a > little while? Wait a little while. The base port is checked in, but a number of optimizations are still pending. > The gcc package obviously depends on the binutils package, so another > issue was not wanting to upgrade the binutils package until a new gcc > was ready since its very likely that the old gcc wouldn't work with the > new binutils, Binutils is completely upstream at this point. If it does something wrong we'd like to hear about it! -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk