Re: Why not more enthused about Roku? (other devices)
"Peter G. Viscarola" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > How much does your PC draw? > This is addressed in innumerable articles on the net. According to a year-old Univ of Waterloo article, about 25 Watts when in "sleep" mode (without the hard-drive spinning -- I assume they're talking about S3 state). Using this mode with the Audiotron would require the A-Tron to send a "magic packet" required to wake the computer -- Which it does not do, and which is a topic that's been discussed ad-nauseum on this list. Soooo, let's assume 60W or so for a system that's ready but "idle" (the CPU is power-saving, the monitor is in sleep mode, and the hard disk is powered-up). This is darn close to your estimate of 50W. > > If you think about how many millions of computers there are > on the planet, running all the time, just so they're ready to > go whenever you need them (even if you don't use them much), > there's a ton of wasted power being generated and consumed > all over. It's really a shame. :-( --Steve > Or not. Assuming a CRT-type monitor that is powered-off to SLEEP state, NOT powering-off the monitor and letting it sleep significantly extends its life. Not powering-down your disk and letting it spin continuously also extends the life of that component. There's an energy cost for producing and transporting a new PC, of course. And you avoid incurring such costs by increasing the useful life of your system. And, if we're talking about what's a "shame" or not, let's fully consider other factors: There's a significant environmental cost to disposing of an old PC -- Especially if it includes a CRT monitor. One could also argue that -- because many obsolete electronic components get sent to third-world countries to be "recycled" (i.e. taken apart with hammers by workers being paid something like slave wages) -- there is a significant ethical and societal cost incurred when the useful life of such equipment is not maximized. Also, consider the broader overall costs involved in NOT having your PC running: You're not automatically installing the latest updates (let's assume you're running Windoze) and you're not automatically updating and running your virus-protection program. These both increase the chance of your computer being compromised (thus causing YOU to incur a significant personal cost -- but let's not have that enter the equation). If your system does become infected, this increases the chance of you spreading that virus... Spreading a computer virus very significantly increases costs to society. Sigh. I think it's a shame everyone doesn't leave their systems on 24x7 ;-) What this all has to do with the A-Tron is, of course, anybody's guess. I wonder what the overall societal cost/benefit analysis is for keeping this list alive for such silly discussions? P