Re: Question on using mp3gain

Jeff Hayes <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yep... you hit the nail on the head.  I never really delved into the
specifics of what replaygain (mp3gain) was doing with regards to it's DM
reference levels and how they equate as far as real world loudness
goes.  My best guess is that I'll probably redo everything at their
suggested 89dB... see how things pan out there.  The biggest thing that
irritates the heck out of me is the fact that the audio coming out of the
digital out on the Audiotron is one HECK of alot lower than that of other
digital coax/optical sources I have... so if I switch the whole-house audio
source from AT to CD player or something, I have to run all over the house
to knock down the volume knobs quite a few notches to prevent being
evicted.. or eviscerated by the wife.  :)

Thanks, Brent.

Regs,
Jeff


At 12:46 PM 1/17/2005, you wrote:
>Yeah...I know that redbook audio supports a theoretical 96db of dynamic
>range. But I don't think that necessarily transfers across to saying that
>the RMS loudness of a track is optimal when it is 96 (according to MP3Gain).
>I could be wrong on that, though.
>
>I've always been a little puzzled by how RMS is expressed anyway. For
>instance, SoundForge expresses RMS as a negative number, with 0 being the
>theoretical maximum loudness. A track that MP3Gain lists as having an RMS of
>94 might equate to an RMS value of -16.5 db in SoundForge.

JEFF HAYES      [email protected]
Member, Group Technical Staff
Digital Audio System Specialist
Imaging and Audio Group
(281)-274-3131  OFFICE
(281)-274-4381  FAX

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
12203 SW Freeway MS 701
Stafford, TX 77477
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.