Re: Question on using mp3gain
Jeff Hayes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yep... you hit the nail on the head. I never really delved into the specifics of what replaygain (mp3gain) was doing with regards to it's DM reference levels and how they equate as far as real world loudness goes. My best guess is that I'll probably redo everything at their suggested 89dB... see how things pan out there. The biggest thing that irritates the heck out of me is the fact that the audio coming out of the digital out on the Audiotron is one HECK of alot lower than that of other digital coax/optical sources I have... so if I switch the whole-house audio source from AT to CD player or something, I have to run all over the house to knock down the volume knobs quite a few notches to prevent being evicted.. or eviscerated by the wife. :) Thanks, Brent. Regs, Jeff At 12:46 PM 1/17/2005, you wrote: >Yeah...I know that redbook audio supports a theoretical 96db of dynamic >range. But I don't think that necessarily transfers across to saying that >the RMS loudness of a track is optimal when it is 96 (according to MP3Gain). >I could be wrong on that, though. > >I've always been a little puzzled by how RMS is expressed anyway. For >instance, SoundForge expresses RMS as a negative number, with 0 being the >theoretical maximum loudness. A track that MP3Gain lists as having an RMS of >94 might equate to an RMS value of -16.5 db in SoundForge. JEFF HAYES [email protected] Member, Group Technical Staff Digital Audio System Specialist Imaging and Audio Group (281)-274-3131 OFFICE (281)-274-4381 FAX TEXAS INSTRUMENTS 12203 SW Freeway MS 701 Stafford, TX 77477