Re: Sonos
Ron Smith <[email protected]> Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:02:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001201c501c9$801f8210$0202a8c0@SERVER01> |
So far, the only one to do it right was TB with the AT. And now that they have dropped the ball I don't know what I will do when my home is rebuilt (destroy by Hurricane Charley) if my AT doesn't work. I packed it away securely before the storm and I have kept it packed until I can return home. It looks like another 4-6 weeks to go. I hope it works. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Hill" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [AT] Sonos > Another interesting attempt, but, as you say, flawed because it's all or > nothing. > > Is it that difficult to get this market right? Manufacturers don't seem > to have any idea what they are doing. > > --Tim > > AndyN wrote: > >>I stumbled across Sonos by reading a review of their new system in the Feb >>issue of Sound and Vision. >> >>Take a look - http://www.sonos.com - I'm impressed. A few things I think >>they did right ... a) a great looking remote with display and iPod-style >>spin wheel; b) appears no server software is required since it supports >>NAS >>boxes; music is stored on the network, not in their box, c) the system is >>multi-zone aware and has the ability to play the same selections in sync >>across zones. Two issues is that the stuff is a little pricy - $500 per >>ZonePlayer, $400 per Controller; and there is no "component" version (with >>digital out, etc) for use with an existing system ... the ZonePlayer has >>built-in amps. >> >>Anyway, probably the most interesting system I've seen ... comments or >>observations welcome. >> >>AndyN >> >> >> >>