Re: Sonos

Ron Smith <[email protected]> Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:02:19 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron
Message-ID <001201c501c9$801f8210$0202a8c0@SERVER01>
So far, the only one to do it right was TB with the AT. And now that they
have dropped the ball I don't know what I will do when my home is rebuilt
(destroy by Hurricane Charley) if my AT doesn't work. I packed it away
securely before the storm and I have kept it packed until I can return home.
It looks like another 4-6 weeks to go. I hope it works.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hill" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [AT] Sonos


> Another interesting attempt, but, as you say, flawed because it's all or
> nothing.
>
> Is it that difficult to get this market right? Manufacturers don't seem
> to have any idea what they are doing.
>
> --Tim
>
> AndyN wrote:
>
>>I stumbled across Sonos by reading a review of their new system in the Feb
>>issue of Sound and Vision.
>>
>>Take a look - http://www.sonos.com - I'm impressed.  A few things I think
>>they did right ... a) a great looking remote with display and iPod-style
>>spin wheel; b) appears no server software is required since it supports
>>NAS
>>boxes; music is stored on the network, not in their box, c) the system is
>>multi-zone aware and has the ability to play the same selections in sync
>>across zones.  Two issues is that the stuff is a little pricy - $500 per
>>ZonePlayer, $400 per Controller; and there is no "component" version (with
>>digital out, etc) for use with an existing system ... the ZonePlayer has
>>built-in amps.
>>
>>Anyway, probably the most interesting system I've seen ... comments or
>>observations welcome.
>>
>>AndyN
>>
>>
>>
>>