Re: Sonos
Tim Hill <[email protected]> Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:11:13 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, I think the trick is to design an open, extensible, audio *platform*, so that users can make this kind of decision, not manufacturers. --Tim Michael Wagner wrote: > I think we'd all be interested. > > The question is, where would you put the tradeoffs? > > I'd love to discuss it more, > on the level of what would you design in, what would you design out? > > Sadly, I probably can't lend any time to the project. Much as I'd love > to. > > Michael > > At 1/24/05 03:21 AM, you wrote: > >> I'm going to stick my neck out to this group... I'm on the verge of >> designing an AT replacement just for my own use. I have no time/interest >> in selling this, but it would be useful to gauge any interest others >> might have in doing similar. >> >> --Tim >> >> >> Ron Smith wrote: >> >>> So far, the only one to do it right was TB with the AT. And now that >>> they >>> have dropped the ball I don't know what I will do when my home is >>> rebuilt >>> (destroy by Hurricane Charley) if my AT doesn't work. I packed it away >>> securely before the storm and I have kept it packed until I can return >>> home. >>> It looks like another 4-6 weeks to go. I hope it works. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Tim Hill" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 6:06 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AT] Sonos >>> >>> >>>> Another interesting attempt, but, as you say, flawed because it's >>>> all or >>>> nothing. >>>> >>>> Is it that difficult to get this market right? Manufacturers don't >>>> seem >>>> to have any idea what they are doing. >>>> >>>> --Tim >>>> >>>> AndyN wrote: >>>> >>>>> I stumbled across Sonos by reading a review of their new system in >>>>> the Feb >>>>> issue of Sound and Vision. >>>>> >>>>> Take a look - http://www.sonos.com - I'm impressed. A few things I >>>>> think >>>>> they did right ... a) a great looking remote with display and >>>>> iPod-style >>>>> spin wheel; b) appears no server software is required since it >>>>> supports >>>>> NAS >>>>> boxes; music is stored on the network, not in their box, c) the >>>>> system is >>>>> multi-zone aware and has the ability to play the same selections in >>>>> sync >>>>> across zones. Two issues is that the stuff is a little pricy - $500 >>>>> per >>>>> ZonePlayer, $400 per Controller; and there is no "component" version >>>>> (with >>>>> digital out, etc) for use with an existing system ... the ZonePlayer >>>>> has >>>>> built-in amps. >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, probably the most interesting system I've seen ... >>>>> comments or >>>>> observations welcome. >>>>> >>>>> AndyN >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> > > http://home.cogeco.ca/~michaelwagner/personal-page.htm > "All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die" Sheryl Crow > >