Re: Argosy HD-363N
Tim Hill <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:49:24 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, thanks. As I mentioned, XP does funny things with the RO attribute. The green box you are seeing is (officially) the XP way of saying "some are set, some are not" when showing the properties for multiple objects. However, for folders, XP overloads the RO attribute with other semantics used by Explorer, and in fact making a folder read-only doesn't change its properties at all (for example, you can still create files in the folder). If you're *really* bored one day you can read the details here... http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326549 --Tim Robin Mitchell wrote: >On Thursday, February 3, 2005, 10:21:24 PM, Tim Hill wrote: > > > >>Does the Read-only attribute correspond to the folders you cannot see >>withTOCMaker? >> >> > >I'm sorry, I didn't describe that very clearly. None of the folders >are actually read-only; they just have an odd attribute display in >WinXP Windows Explorer. Pretty much whenever I right-click on a >folder and select "Properties" from the menu, the dialog box that >comes up has a funny green square in the "Read only" attribute >checkbox. It's not the checkmark that would be there if the folder >really were read-only, nor the empty box that would be there if it >weren't. And I see that even if there are no read-only files in the >folder, so it isn't that either. > >Anyway, whatever it is, it's almost certainly a red herring here and I >probably shouldn't have mentioned it. When I do a "DIR \\NAS\AT /A:R" >to list all of the read-only folders, none show up, so I don't think >that's causing the problem. > >Sorry about the confusion... > > -- Robin > > > >