Re: Help configuring AT with XP and Crossover Cable]

Chris Dickens <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:23:08 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron
Message-ID <000001c51a73$fbf89260$6d010a0a@IRONHIDE>
Tim:

He hasn't mentioned anything about a VPN yet, so I'm assuming he doesn't use
one.  Also, if port forwarding is set up for some things on the corporate
router, then this configuration would firewall those ports back off at the
second router, but that's also unlikely.  Worst case scenerio, he could try
it and if he has any trouble, just go back to the way it was before and keep
troubleshooting.  If no trouble, then he just saved a lot of time - that's
the way I look at it.

--Chris

-----Original Message-----
Date:    Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:35:36 -0800
From:    Tim Hill <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [AT] Help configuring AT with XP and Crossover Cable]

My problem with that is that with the PC the wrong side of a private router,
he may have trouble getting access to some corporate resources on his LAN.

--Tim

Chris Dickens wrote:

>Tim:
>
>Skip the second NIC like Tim says.  Configure it like this:
>
>        [Internet] <--> [Company Router] <--> [Your Router]
>                                             |      |
>                                            [PC]   [AT]
>
>Set your PC and AT for DHCP and the router for the same and you should 
>be golden.
>
>--Chris
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Date:    Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:51:02 -0500
>From:    Tim Carlson <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [AT] Help configuring AT with XP and Crossover 
>Cable]
>
>Yeah, the whole thing started because the router I'm on belongs to the 
>company, and I want to take the AT off of it. I thought this would be a 
>simple thing to do.
>
>Yes, everything works fine if I plug both the PC and the AT into the 
>router.
>
>Thanks for all the help.
>
>-Tim
>
>On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:22:21 -0800, Tim Hill <[email protected]> 
>wrote:
>
>
>
>>Unlikely to be a cable issue since you can access the internet and 
>>ping. I'm curious... if you connect the AT to NIC #1 can you access 
>>the shares?
>>
>>I'm also trying to recall the reason for not having the AT on the NIC1 
>>LAN segment? If you've prepared to get another cheap router (and that 
>>might be the best way) I would ditch the whole second NIC thing and 
>>place you PC and the AT the other side of the router.
>>
>>--Tim
>>
>>Tim Carlson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yes, I'm trying to get the AT off of the router. So, I plug my NIC#1 
>>>into the router which is connected to the Internet, then the AT plugs 
>>>into NIC#2. In order for the AT to access Turtle Radio, I have to 
>>>share the connection that is established via NIC#1, at least that's 
>>>my understanding. If there's another way to do that, then let me 
>>>know.
>>>
>>>What I'm thinking about trying is:
>>>
>>>
>>>      AT<----->new cheap router<------->XP(NIC2)
>>>                                           |
>>>                                           |
>>>                                         XP(NIC1)<---->router<--
>>>
>>>
>>Internet
>>
>>
>>>I'll keep the "new cheap router" off of the Internet if I can and try 
>>>sharing the Internet connection established by NIC1. If I can't, then
>>>
>>>
>I'll
>
>
>>>get another IP address, and run two separate systems.
>>>
>>>Any suggestions for the "new cheap router"?
>>>
>>>Also, as a last ditch effort on the Xover cable method, I was 
>>>wondering
>>>
>>>
>if
>
>
>>>it was a duplex issue? It seems that I read somewhere that the AT
>>>
>>>
>operates
>
>
>>>at half duplex. I haven't checked the NIC2 card, but maybe it's set 
>>>at full and maybe that's the issue.
>>>
>>>-Tim

------------------------------

End of AUDIOTRON Digest - 22 Feb 2005 to 23 Feb 2005 (#2005-52)
***************************************************************