Re: Developing replacement for AT
"Peter G. Viscarola" <[email protected]> Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:02:10 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I'm particularly fond of the AT's feature of not requiring server-side software to communicate with the AT. Is this in your plan? I assume a hard-wired ethernet interface is on your feature list as well? Regarding a previous poster's request for Ipod connectivity: Once connected, you interact with the ipod like it were a disk. So, THAT"s not a problem. The only pain is keeping the "index" files up to date. This has been reverse engineered, and there are several implementations available on the web. P=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum=20 > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glenn Richards > Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 7:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AT] Developing replacement for AT >=20 > Right... the project is a bit tentative at this stage, but a=20 > group of us are looking at developing a replacement for the=20 > Audiotron. We're currently building a prototype on an=20 > embedded development board, and aiming to have the following features: >=20 > * Support for MP3 (obviously), WAV, OGG and FLAC files > * Extensible architecture allowing new features/formats to be added > * USB interface for eg 802.11g interface > * Similar UI, front panel controls/display >=20 > Additionally we're looking to possibly include the following options: >=20 > * Ability to plug in a USB hard disk and CD-ROM. The unit would then > function as "master", with other units on the same=20 > network operating > as "slave". CD-ROM would enable ripping to FLAC format. >=20 > * Web interface, as on the Audiotron >=20 > Currently we are experimenting with an embedded development=20 > board, and I have a number of samples of a high quality=20 > Burr-Brown DAC with SPDIF capability. >=20 > I have not included WMA or internet radio support in the=20 > above spec, as we're aiming this at the high quality audio=20 > market and 56Kbit/sec MP3 streaming isn't quite up to=20 > audiophile standards! WMA is lossy (and proprietary!), and=20 > the intention here is to use FLAC as the primary format for=20 > reasons of quality. >=20 > So, anyone have any comments? Any features of the AT that you=20 > can't live without? Or any features you've always desperately=20 > wanted on the AT? >=20 > -- > Glenn Richards Tel:=20 > (01453) 845735 > Squirrel Solutions =20 > http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/ >=20 > IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband=20 > installation >=20