Re: Developing replacement for AT

Jamie Edgar <[email protected]> Sat, 5 Mar 2005 17:45:52 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron
Message-ID <AUDIOTRON%[email protected]>
Great idea.

1: The web interface is obviously crucial, but I must say I use ATTray
interface on all my PCs in the house and it's performance & GUI is much
better than the default web interface.  If you remake the web-server --
think about that GUI / interface.

2: Support for Pocket PC - for handheld use.

3: Queuing: Support to move files in/out of queue with out effecting current
song playing (like WinAmp).

4: Support for more than 10,000 songs

5: I never use the front of the AT (only to cycle power), how about a remote
reboot?





-----Original Message-----
From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glenn Richards
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 7:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AT] Developing replacement for AT

Right... the project is a bit tentative at this stage, but a group of us are
looking at developing a replacement for the Audiotron. We're currently
building a prototype on an embedded development board, and aiming to have
the following features:

  * Support for MP3 (obviously), WAV, OGG and FLAC files
  * Extensible architecture allowing new features/formats to be added
  * USB interface for eg 802.11g interface
  * Similar UI, front panel controls/display

Additionally we're looking to possibly include the following options:

  * Ability to plug in a USB hard disk and CD-ROM. The unit would then
    function as "master", with other units on the same network operating
    as "slave". CD-ROM would enable ripping to FLAC format.

  * Web interface, as on the Audiotron

Currently we are experimenting with an embedded development board, and I
have a number of samples of a high quality Burr-Brown DAC with SPDIF
capability.

I have not included WMA or internet radio support in the above spec, as
we're aiming this at the high quality audio market and 56Kbit/sec MP3
streaming isn't quite up to audiophile standards! WMA is lossy (and
proprietary!), and the intention here is to use FLAC as the primary format
for reasons of quality.

So, anyone have any comments? Any features of the AT that you can't live
without? Or any features you've always desperately wanted on the AT?

--
  Glenn Richards                                     Tel: (01453) 845735
  Squirrel Solutions                 http://www.squirrelsolutions.co.uk/

  IT consultancy, hardware and software support, broadband installation