Re: Developing replacement for AT
Dave Miller <[email protected]> Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:11:18 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hardware.voyetra.audiotron |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5C1F62EB07564945B30677F6B62D87FC04712D@mail01.trex.tegriscorp.com> |
I'm finding that the Roku Photobridge is meeting many of the = capabilities of the audiotron and far exceeding it in that also streams = hi-def video and photos. It does not require a pc but does require a = television on to navigate. =20 =20 The things I much prefer about the AT right now are: * ease of use, the front interface I use a lot just to select internet = radio or random through my music. It works like my stereo gear without = the TV. * extremely reliable, this is an issue with the Roku right now (I am = using beta software) =20 With the roku, coding and third party applications you can: * stream dvds from disk * hexradio, third party turtleradio like=20 * custom UIs have been created. * custom movie player that is pretty nice (third party) * hi-def output capability * next beta will have UPnP support which opens up a whole myriad of = options * has web server, but will require custom code to control the device. = There's also other ways to control it remotely. =20 Things I don't like: * overheats, it can't be near anything else and gets flakey when it = overheats * reliability, I think mainly due to heat though =20 I still almost always use my AT for music, but there is also a very = strong development community around this device. Check out their = forums, it will give you a much better idea of it's capabilities. =20 =20 ________________________________ From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum on behalf of Jim Anderson Sent: Sat 3/5/2005 3:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT Keep in mind that DRM is optional. You can rip any CD lossless with no = DRM whatsoever. -----Original Message----- From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee Sarver Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 3:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT I wouldn't miss WMA at all. DRM in any form is a huge negative for me, regardless of audio quality. -----Original Message----- From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Arnt Gulbrandsen Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT Jim Anderson writes: > I know it's not "cool" to embrace anything from Microsoft, but > lossless WMA makes sense to a lot of audiophiles - There are reasons why it's not cool. Embracing Microsoft stuff typically involves paying Microsoft more than you like or else doing a hell or a = lot of work - or both. Arnt