Re: Developing replacement for AT

I do:  .wavs for home and .mp3s for the road.

-----Original Message-----
From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Jim Anderson
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 5:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT


Keep in mind that DRM is optional.  You can rip any CD lossless with no DRM
whatsoever.

-----Original Message-----
From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lee Sarver
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 3:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT

I wouldn't miss WMA at all.  DRM in any form is a huge negative for me,
regardless of audio quality.

-----Original Message-----
From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Arnt Gulbrandsen
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT


Jim Anderson writes:
> I know it's not "cool" to embrace anything from Microsoft, but
> lossless WMA makes sense to a lot of audiophiles -

There are reasons why it's not cool. Embracing Microsoft stuff typically
involves paying Microsoft more than you like or else doing a hell or a lot
of work - or both.

Arnt