Re: Developing replacement for AT

Peter G. Viscarola wrote:

>What are you targeting, realistically, in terms of price?
>
>
yes, price is an interesting object. Either make a Roku under price or
otherwise
hoover around Roku price but differentiate (control without remote, good
http
interface without server side software and so on).

I see a great potential for people not willing to pay exorbitant prices
for proprietary
multi-room sound systems. That was the reason I went with Audiotrons
(have 3,
would need another 3 or so), people like CorAccess have modules to drive
Audiotrons
via WEB interface. It's the only alternative to paying an arm and a leg
for a
proprietary system. Implies: Make an exact Audiotron compatible http
controlling
interface and there should be market by integrators that want to drive
prices down
(albeit I'm sure B&O and people like that give them huge margins so
maybe they
don't want competition actually)

    -- tony