Re: Developing replacement for AT

WMA files do not mean DRM.

Danny Rego


----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Sarver" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT


>I wouldn't miss WMA at all.  DRM in any form is a huge negative for me,
> regardless of audio quality.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Turtle Beach Audiotron User Forum
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Arnt Gulbrandsen
> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 11:35 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AT] Developing replacement for AT
>
>
> Jim Anderson writes:
>> I know it's not "cool" to embrace anything from Microsoft, but
>> lossless WMA makes sense to a lot of audiophiles -
>
> There are reasons why it's not cool. Embracing Microsoft stuff typically
> involves paying Microsoft more than you like or else doing a hell or a
> lot of work - or both.
>
> Arnt
>
>