Re: Developing replacement for AT - Suprised? Seth?

Im suprised Seth hasnt chimed it as of yet.  He usually frowns on
discussions of replacement AT products.

It must be because of the weekend.  It always cracks me up when we use a
company's mailing list to push a replacement product.  I think the one
difference here is that the product we are trying to replace is going out
to pasture....


Tony Przygienda said:
> Peter G. Viscarola wrote:
>
>>What are you targeting, realistically, in terms of price?
>>
>>
> yes, price is an interesting object. Either make a Roku under price or
> otherwise
> hoover around Roku price but differentiate (control without remote, good
> http
> interface without server side software and so on).
>
> I see a great potential for people not willing to pay exorbitant prices
> for proprietary
> multi-room sound systems. That was the reason I went with Audiotrons
> (have 3,
> would need another 3 or so), people like CorAccess have modules to drive
> Audiotrons
> via WEB interface. It's the only alternative to paying an arm and a leg
> for a
> proprietary system. Implies: Make an exact Audiotron compatible http
> controlling
> interface and there should be market by integrators that want to drive
> prices down
> (albeit I'm sure B&O and people like that give them huge margins so
> maybe they
> don't want competition actually)
>
>     -- tony
>