Re: Developing replacement for AT

At 3/5/05 05:45 PM  Saturday, Jamie Edgar wrote:
>If you remake the web-server -- think about that GUI / interface.

Yes. I have many ideas here. But the single biggest one is responsiveness.
It's absolutely lethal to wait 6 seconds for a status update, especially
just after starting a new song. Makes DJing off the box impossible.

>3: Queuing: Support to move files in/out of queue with out effecting current
>song playing (like WinAmp).

or Slim. Absolutely important.

>4: Support for more than 10,000 songs

already there, I believe. I think the limit is 30,000 now. But the real
limit is what that does to responsiveness and performance.

Michael

http://home.cogeco.ca/~michaelwagner/personal-page.htm
"All I wanna do is have a little fun before I die" Sheryl Crow