Re: More interactive jobs / Less interactive talent ?
"Nancy Broden" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.hci.experiencedesign |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 15 Mar 2007 11:16:13 -0700, Wunderlich, Judi <[email protected]> wrote: > What about everyone on this list who hires or recruits? Do you agree, > disagree, have any observations or comments? I am the interaction design director at a small-ish design consultancy in San Francisco. In my role I have been hiring interaction designers at all levels of experience over the last 2 years. What is clear is that Silicon Valley is booming again and job candidates have a wealth of opportunities to consider. The BayCHI jobs list, which I look to as a barometer of industry activity in the Bay Area, has had close to 100 jobs listed weekly for at least the last year - year and a half. The jobs listed represent a broad spectrum, from intern- to director-level positions at established companies, start-ups and agencies. This has made it difficult for an agency like mine to compete for talent, since we are not large enough to offer the same salaries, bonuses and other perks as the Googles of this world. However, the tight market also means that the people we hire are more committed to our agency, since they have selected our offer instead of the others they have in hand. While it is true that most companies and agencies generally look for people with at least a few years of relevant experience, we rate intelligence, personality and potential highly and will overlook a lack of qualifications or experience in someone we feel confident will grow quickly into a valuable team member. -- Nancy -------------------------------------- [email protected]